º£½ÇÊÓÆµ

Oops.

Our website is temporarily unavailable in your location.

We are working hard to get it back online.

PRIVACY
Economic Development

Future of Plymouth's ice arena development uncertain as construction costs spiral

Firm behind planned 1,500-seater rink looks for ways to proceed after Covid caused proposed operator to pull out and build costs to soar

How the Mayflower Ice Arena could look

Hopes that Plymouth will have a new ice arena are in danger of melting away after the Covid pandemic caused the expected operator to withdraw and construction costs to spiral.

The long-awaited rink is scheduled to be built on land right next to Plymouth Argyle’s Home Park football stadium but the company behind the The Mayflower Ice Arena project says it is now struggling to make the scheme financially viable.

HHP Nominee Ltd, whose sole director is former Argyle chairman James Brent, insists it has not given up on the project but at the moment it stands to make a large loss on the build, meaning there is mounting uncertainty and it has had to reassess its options.

The proposed 1,500-seater arena was well on track in early 2020, with construction expected to start that year on a 40,000sq ft building sited between the redeveloped stadium grandstand and the Life Centre sports complex.

But that was before the Covid pandemic reached the º£½ÇÊÓÆµ, causing lockdowns and subsequent problems for the construction industry. Contracts to build and operate the new ice arena were within days of being signed when the pandemic arrived at these shores.

A heads of terms agreement had been struck with a major leisure operator for the long-term lease of the Mayflower Ice Arena. Under the proposed agreement, land owner HHP Nominee Ltd agreed to pay for the construction of the “shell and core” of the building and the operator agreed to pay the significant costs involved for the fit-out of the ice arena.

But on March 13, 2020, just three days before the Government ordered the first lockdown, the operator “ understandably” notified HHP Nominee that in the light of the Covid-19 pandemic and the resulting uncertainty, it was not at that point willing to enter into the agreement to lease the arena. It remained interested, however, in discussing the opportunity to come back on board once the impact of the pandemic had become clear.

Meanwhile, a separate contract to build the arena, which had also been substantially agreed between HHP Nominee and its chosen contractor, had to be put on hold following the proposed operator’s decision to withdraw.