º£½ÇÊÓÆµ

Oops.

Our website is temporarily unavailable in your location.

We are working hard to get it back online.

PRIVACY
Retail & Consumer

Why Government fracking u-turn could be a red herring

Change in policy could see domestic shale gas production begin in as little as six months - in areas where there is local support

Dame Vivienne Westwood protesting outside the energy firm Cuadrilla's facking site, near Blackpool in 2018(Image: PA)

Lifting the two year ban on fracking won’t ease the immediate energy supply crisis according to industry experts.

As she announced measures to help with domestic and business energy bills, new PM Liz Truss said she was also ending the two year ban on fracturing rocks with high-pressure water to extract shale gas.

There have been concerns that the process can cause ground movement and water pollution and release toxic gases into the environment. There are also fears it could see the industrial development of rural areas while burning shale gas would add to global warming when investment in green technologies should be considered instead.

The PM’s change in policy could see domestic shale gas production begin in as little as six months in areas where there is support.

She said she wants to make the º£½ÇÊÓÆµ a “net energy exporter by 2040” via fracking, nuclear and the acceleration of renewables.

However, even the new Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng has previously said fracking would come at a high cost for communities and countryside.

Writing in the Mail on Sunday six months ago he said people calling for fracking’s return misunderstood the current energy situation.

He said: “If we lifted the fracking moratorium, it would take up to a decade to extract sufficient volumes – and it would come at a high cost for communities and our precious countryside.