º£½ÇÊÓÆµ

Oops.

Our website is temporarily unavailable in your location.

We are working hard to get it back online.

PRIVACY
Retail & Consumer

Frasers insists Mahmud Kamani 'must go' at Boohoo despite his move to vice-chair

Boohoo founder Mahmud Kamani has stepped back from his role as executive chairman and will become vice-chairman

Boohoo and Frasers have been trading public statements(Image: Ian West/PA)

Frasers Group has swiftly reacted to the news that Boohoo's executive chair Mahmud Kamani will transition to vice chair, asserting that this move is insufficient and he "must go".

In a statement released this morning, Boohoo's leading shareholder demanded a meeting to oust Kamani from the board, proposing Mike Ashley and Mike Lennon as replacements.

Concurrently, Boohoo disclosed that co-founder Mahmud Kamani was succeeded by non-executive director Tim Morris as chairman, effective immediately, with Kamani assuming the role of vice chair, as reported by .

However, Frasers maintains its stance, reiterating its earlier assertion: "[The board] is ultimately run by Mr Kamani, for the benefit of Mr Kamani," describing the board as "dysfunctional".

"His title might have changed but his grip on the company has not. Recent events, in particular the interim results, lack of transparency and further supply chain allegations, should leave shareholders in no doubt Mr. Kamani must go," commented a Frasers spokesperson following Boohoo's update.

Boohoo's recent half-year financial report showed a 15 per cent drop in revenue, a 10.5 per cent decrease in adjusted EBITDA, and a net debt surge exceeding £100m.

This incident marks the latest clash in an ongoing series of disputes between Frasers Group and Boohoo, with both parties levelling accusations of self-interest. The feud has been escalating for almost a month.

Frasers Group has accused the retailer of "long-term mismanagement" leading to significant "value destruction". It also criticised the retailer's £222 million refinancing plan, but rival Boohoo labelled Frasers' assessment as "inaccurate and unfair".