º£½ÇÊÓÆµ

Oops.

Our website is temporarily unavailable in your location.

We are working hard to get it back online.

PRIVACY
Professional Services

St James’s Place revises fees after financial regulator pressure

Bosses at the wealth management firm said they were seeing the effects of inflation ‘moderating’ adding that rising interest rates could be ‘reaching a peak’

Coins and banknotes(Image: Dominic Lipinski/PA Wire)

Wealth management firm St James’s Place (SJP) has revised its charging structures following pressure from the financial regulator.

The FTSE 100 company, which is headquartered in Gloucestershire with offices around the º£½ÇÊÓÆµ, said the changes would apply to the “vast majority” of new investment bonds and pensions.

Like this story? Why not sign up to get the latest South West business news straight to your inbox.

The new structure will operate without any early withdrawal charges (EWC) or gestation period, as is already the case with SJP’s unit trust and ISA business.

Bosses said charges across all its ‘wrapper asset funds’, which have historically been disclosed primarily on an all-inclusive basis, would now be separated into component parts, which they said would comprise initial and ongoing advice, investment management, and product administration which will be tiered for larger investments.

The board said the changes were designed to reduce overall ongoing charges for existing investments across core products and would come into effect in the second half of 2025. The company’s senior leaders added that the changes would reduce SJP's underlying cash over “the next few years”.

The revamp comes after the Financial Conduct Authority introduced new industry rules to protect savers and investors from fees and charges deemed to be unfair or not representing value for customers.

SJP chief executive Andrew Croft said: “We have always been confident that SJP offers its clients real value that helps individuals and families achieve financial wellbeing. However, it is increasingly evident that consumers are seeking simple comparability, and this has been reflected in regulatory trends too, as highlighted with the Assessment of Value and Consumer Duty regimes. The review of our charging model reflects these developments.