º£½ÇÊÓÆµ

Oops.

Our website is temporarily unavailable in your location.

We are working hard to get it back online.

PRIVACY
Professional Services

Dishonest Plymouth solicitor struck off by tribunal

Raymond Lawrence Toms was found to have committed “serious, systemic and calculated acts of dishonesty”

The former Goldbergs' offices in Mutley, Plymouth(Image: Google)

A Plymouth solicitor has been struck off after years of dishonestly using clients’ cash to boost his own finances.

Raymond Lawrence Toms, sole practitioner with Plymouth firm Goldbergs Solicitors, was found to have committed “serious, systemic and calculated acts of dishonesty” over an extended period, by a Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. Charities and vulnerable people were among those affected by his actions.

Mr Toms, who had been a solicitor for 47 years, admitted moving client cash to an office account to boost his firm’s bank balance, and seeking to disguise the transfers by cancelling, delaying or failing to send cheques.

In an agreed outcome with the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), which effectively means Toms accepted the accusations, he also admitted overcharging clients and failing to pay disbursements to third parties within a reasonable time or even at all.

Goldbergs was based in two adjoining, four-storey, 19th Century houses in Ford Park Road(Image: Google)

In explaining why Toms was struck off the solicitors’ roll, the tribunal said Toms’ acts of dishonesty were “numerous and repeated”, and to the detriment of clients, beneficiaries and third parties, and to the benefit of himself and his firm.

The tribunal report said he used funds to which he had no right to use, and to aid his own cash flow and financial position, and cover up previous transfers.

It said Toms’ misconduct and dishonesty risked damaging the reputation of the legal profession and said: “These were serious, systemic and calculated acts of dishonesty committed over an extended period which benefited the respondent to the detriment of clients’ estates beneficiaries and third parties, including charities and vulnerable people.

“Wrongdoing by the respondent was concealed both by further wrongdoing, and on initial investigation by the SRA.