º£½ÇÊÓÆµ

Oops.

Our website is temporarily unavailable in your location.

We are working hard to get it back online.

PRIVACY
Professional Services

New £375m Future Fund from the º£½ÇÊÓÆµ Government will do little to level up

Professor Dylan Jones-Evans said the criteria of the fund means that most investments will benefit firms in London and the south-east of England

Chancellor Rishi Sunak(Image: Hannah McKay/PA Wire)

A new £375m fund from the º£½ÇÊÓÆµ Government to back the growth of high-tech and research and development focused firms will do little to support its levelling up agenda with its investment criteria loaded in favour of London and the south-east of England says a leading enterprise academic.

The Treasury has launched its successor to its now closed £1bn Future Fund, with its Future Fund:Breakthrough. The fund will see the º£½ÇÊÓÆµ Government investing 30% of equity into funding rounds of at least £30m.

Recipients of the fund will also have needed to have raised at least £5m in previous equity rounds in the last five years. Moreover, firms must be committed to having 20% of employees carrying out R&D for at least three years from the date of investment, as well as spending on average 10% of its cost base on R&D over the last three years.

The previous fund, the Future Fund, saw the lion’s share (around 72% on value) of debt to equity funding going into firms in London and south-east. The deal flow in Wales accounted for less than 2% of the total on value.

Professor Dylan Jones-Evans of the University of South Wales said outside of London and the south-east a far lesser number of tech firms would be entitled to backing from the Future Fund:Breakthrough. He pointed to the fact that in Wales in the last five years only a handful of tech firms have raised £5m in equity with funding rounds in access of £30m even rarer.

Under the Future Fund firms needed to have raised £250,000 in a previous equity round. It provided funding up to £5m.

As part of its levelling up agenda, Prof Jones-Evans said the Treasury should have had set a less onerous criteria for its new fund for firms outside of London and the south-east where investment rounds of £30m and higher are more commonplace.

He added: “The access to finance review which I put together for the Welsh Government in 2013 showed the massive gap in venture capital funding between the poorer regions such as Wales and the more prosperous parts of the º£½ÇÊÓÆµ. Fast forward eight years, and it is extremely disappointing that this new venture fund again seems have taken no account of the regional differences in venture capital that exists across the º£½ÇÊÓÆµ.