º£½ÇÊÓÆµ

Oops.

Our website is temporarily unavailable in your location.

We are working hard to get it back online.

PRIVACY
Opinion

Verdict on Welsh Government's new approach to road investment

Mostof the cancelled schemes are located in areas where public transport can effectively take cars off the roads.

The Roads Review represents a complete shift in how Wales approaches its road networks(Image: Ian Cooper/North Wales Live)

Moving transport from the government department for economy and transport to that of climate change was a clear indication that radical changes in transport roads policy and capital scheme evaluation criteria would follow.

In the 1960s determining whether a road should be built used the CoBA methodology. This compared costs with the benefits achieved through journey time savings, vehicle operating cost savings and accident cost savings (to the NHS). These ‘generalised’ costs considered, in monetary terms, goods and people movement efficiency; paralleling a business process to determine maximum returns (economic benefits/profit)

By the 1980s road building/increasing car usage impacts on noise, air quality, visual intrusion and wildlife were being considered. However there was no monetary value (despite this columnist’s 1982 post-graduate thesis on monetarising these) and so were given secondary importance in highway capital evaluation.

From the mid-1990s it was realised that a new approach was needed. The º£½ÇÊÓÆµ Department for Transport (DfT five case business Model currently forms the basis of transport scheme evaluation in Wales (called WelTAG – the Welsh Transport Assessment and Guidance). The cases are:

  • Strategic – is there a strategic transport basis for building this road or railway.
  • Economic – a socioeconomic appraisal of costs and benefits; demand forecasts.
  • Financial – whole life costs of the scheme; affordability for government or partners.
  • Commercial – viability of procurement options
  • Management – is the scheme deliverable through planning, risk, logistics.

Last year DfT made the strategic case predominant over the economic case which was a significant step forward in England.

The Welsh Government’s recommended new evaluation criteria so any road scheme should:

  • Minimise carbon emissions in construction (and reduce noise and pollution impacts on residents adjacent to the scheme.
  • Not lead to higher vehicle speeds so increasing emissions.
  • Not increase capacity for cars.
  • Not adversely affect ecologically valuable sites.
  • Provide better access to development sites (for investment and jobs).
  • Reduce road casualties.

Moving the evaluation emphasis to climate change should not discourage inward investment so long as the access criterion gives the road/rail capacity required when considering Wales as a location for their factories, warehouses or offices.

There is no suggestion in the Roads Review that all road building should end. Most of the cancelled schemes are located in areas where public transport can effectively take cars off the roads. This provides more capacity for freight transport, and for rural/urban shadow areas where the traveller critical mass is insufficient to provide an acceptable frequency and fare/revenue support level.