º£½ÇÊÓÆµ

Oops.

Our website is temporarily unavailable in your location.

We are working hard to get it back online.

PRIVACY
Opinionopinion

Other countries do without governors - so why can't we?

Lots of other countries manage without governors. If we want to continue this historic custom, it needs a modern re-think.

Is it time to rethink school governors? There is a touch of the Victorian Board School Trustees about what we have – the great and good of a community deigning to dictate to under-educated and socially inferior teachers how they must improve.

Into that quaint cultural context has then been chucked all the responsibilities that governments have wanted to get off their own backs.

The demands on a state school governor are unrealistic.

It is no wonder the citizens of this country are not exactly lining up to take on the unpaid role.

The idea that governors should be holding headteachers to account has been dreamed up by people who have no idea of the daily life of a head.

Heads are held to account for their smallest and largest move every minute of their day. If it is not their own teachers, it is parents en masse or individually knocking at their door and if there is a moment when the head might be drawing breath, the children are demanding improvements or the media is berating them.

The last thing likely to benefit children’s education is yet more (and unlikely to be any different) challenges imposed by governors.

It would be worth actually asking state school heads if the inordinate amount of time that now has to be spent preparing for governors meetings and sitting in them in order to ensure governors are in a position to fulfil their many statutory duties, has the positive outcomes for the children that such a commitment surely demands.