º£½ÇÊÓÆµ

Oops.

Our website is temporarily unavailable in your location.

We are working hard to get it back online.

PRIVACY
Opinionopinion

Politicians need to level with us about what 'levelling up' really means

The prosperity gap demands action, not empty slogans

There is a real lack of clarity about what 'levelling up' actually means(Image: PA)

Since the general election in December 2019, the term “levelling up” has become used regularly by politicians in addressing the economic and social inequalities that exist across the º£½ÇÊÓÆµ.

While the Covid-19 pandemic clearly interrupted any plans for developing policies to deal with this issue, it has returned as a central theme of the programme for government as set out in the Queen’s Speech earlier this year.

But what does the º£½ÇÊÓÆµ Government mean by levelling up and what will the policy aim to achieve over the next three years? That very question was at the heart of a recent report published by the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee at the House of Commons.

Unfortunately, the 11 MPs on the committee concluded that while it is something that is brought up constantly by the Prime Minister, the Cabinet and other politicians as being the central purpose and mission of the º£½ÇÊÓÆµ Government, there remains a lack of clarity about what it means beyond the aim of “improving everyday life and life chances”.

This opaqueness means that not only is there currently little understanding of how this will translate into policies and strategies, there is a danger that it will have little real impact, especially given the difficulties in assessing its impact on individuals, businesses and localities.

This is not to say that the concept is unimportant, as there have been considerable regional imbalances in the º£½ÇÊÓÆµ for many years and the economic differences between the more prosperous and poorest parts of the country have been growing.

Certainly, there is a consensus that dealing with such inequalities must be an integral part of any post-pandemic recovery, especially as it is clear that a number of areas in the º£½ÇÊÓÆµ have suffered disproportionately as a result of the pandemic.

Yet according to the evidence in the report, it would seem there is no clear strategy to address this. Instead there is a patchwork of policies which have little relation or relevance to each other, and range from developing an approach to combat obesity to plans for the creation of Freeports.