In the mid-1990s, the concept of regional innovation ecosystems was still in its infancy.
When policymakers talked about knowledge transfer and technology commercialisation, the prevailing model was a linear one namely that universities would produce research, government would fund infrastructure, and industry would, eventually, find ways to use it. The idea that these three sectors should work in close collaboration by designing solutions together was far from mainstream thinking.
That began to change with the pioneering work of inspiring scholars such as Henry Etzkowitz and Loet Leydesdorff, who introduced the triple helix model of innovation. Their insight was simple but powerful namely that innovation thrives when universities, businesses, and government actively co-create solutions rather than working in isolation.
This collaborative framework challenged the notion of separate roles by instead proposing an overlapping and intertwined approach – like a helix - that could accelerate regional economic development.
While these ideas were being developed in theory, real-world experiments began to emerge. In the late 1990s, I had the privilege of working with Professor Magnus Klofsten in Sweden on the Linköping Technopole, a groundbreaking initiative that brought together academia, civic authorities, and emerging tech businesses to create a vibrant entrepreneurial ecosystem.
At Linköping, we saw how the university provided research excellence and talent, government invested in enabling infrastructure, and businesses translated knowledge into market-ready innovations. More crucially, we learned that businesses were the driving force behind success, and the most impactful initiatives were those where entrepreneurs and growing companies, rather than government and universities, set the agenda by identifying opportunities, shaping the direction of technology development, and leading commercialisation efforts.
Since those early days, the triple helix framework has become a foundation for modern innovation policy around the world and from science parks to regional innovation boards, from incubators to technology clusters, the principles of cross-sector collaboration have reshaped how economies develop knowledge-based industries.
Over the past decade, this thinking has been further advanced by the work of Brad Feld on start-up communities. Feld’s model emphasises that thriving entrepreneurial ecosystems are built over the long term, led by entrepreneurs themselves, and supported by networks of mentors, investors, universities, and civic leaders.
Most Read
Like the triple helix, it recognises the value of collaboration across sectors but makes it clear that sustainable start-up ecosystems must have entrepreneurial and innovative companies at their core. This bottom-up, entrepreneur-first approach has become the latest evolution of the approaches we first explored in the 1990s, reinforcing that the most effective innovation strategies are those driven by the private sector with academia and government supporting rather than directing progress.
The º£½ÇÊÓÆµ has experimented with various forms of these partnerships most notably through initiatives like Innovation Accelerators and the Strength in Places Fund. Both demonstrated that when businesses, academia, and government come together to target specific regional strengths, the results can be transformative i.e. faster commercialisation of research, increased private investment, and the creation of high-value jobs.
Yet, many of these initiatives have often been led by public or academic institutions, with businesses brought in late or treated as junior partners and this imbalance has limited their impact.
This brings us to the newly announced Local Innovation Partnerships Fund (LIPF), launched this month by º£½ÇÊÓÆµ Research and Innovation. With up to £500m of investment, it aims to develop and scale high-potential regional innovation clusters across the º£½ÇÊÓÆµ by explicitly embracing Triple Helix governance and requiring strong collaboration between businesses, civic leaders, and universities to shape local innovation portfolios.
Unlike traditional top-down funding programmes, the LIPF recognises that the most effective innovation strategies are locally tailored i.e. each region has distinctive assets, capabilities, and opportunities and it is the people closest to those opportunities who best understand how to exploit them.
But for this initiative to truly succeed, business must lead and decision-making within these partnerships cannot be dominated by public authorities or academic institutions. Entrepreneurs, scaleups, and established industry leaders need to set the strategic direction, prioritise investment opportunities, and lead delivery, working alongside government whose role is to enable and de-risk private investment through targeted funding and infrastructure.
Universities can provide research excellence, talent, and technology transfer expertise but only businesses can define market needs, attract private capital, and ensure that innovation translates into sustainable growth.
Don’t miss
Building on lessons from the past, the LIPF offers an opportunity to create truly collaborative, business-led partnerships that leverage regional strengths to deliver impact at scale. For those of us who have been working on these concepts since the 1990s, this feels like a milestone moment namely an opportunity to embed business-led Triple Helix governance into the heart of º£½ÇÊÓÆµ economic strategy.
Indeed, if implemented effectively, the LIPF could transform the innovation landscape, creating stronger, locally owned ecosystems that reflect real commercial opportunities, crowding in private investment, generating high-value jobs, and building long-term innovation capacity that survives beyond the lifetime of individual grants.
In the last thirty years, the Triple Helix model has evolved from academic theory to global policy practice and with the LIPF, there is a chance to take it to the next level by placing businesses at the centre of collaborative innovation.
Whilst government and academia remain essential partners, their key role should be to support the entrepreneurs and firms that ultimately drive growth. Certainly, if we get this right, the º£½ÇÊÓÆµ can unlock the full power of its regional innovation assets, turning knowledge into opportunity and delivering sustainable prosperity across all parts of the country.