º£½ÇÊÓÆµ

Oops.

Our website is temporarily unavailable in your location.

We are working hard to get it back online.

PRIVACY
Opinion

Elon Musk and the drama of his Twitter acquisition

He’s never lost his appetite for change before when he’s come up against it and, somehow, I can’t see that shifting now.

If Elon Musk had a crystal ball would he have acquired Twitter?(Image: PA)

Even the wealthiest can’t buy a crystal ball – but if they could, do you think Elon Musk would have gone ahead with the purchase of Twitter knowing what he does now?

None of us know the answer to that either, but when the wealthiest man in the world reportedly loses that title after taking on another company, you’d be forgiven for thinking that he might have given it a miss.

I first wrote about Musk buying Twitter in this column last May, saying: “Whatever Musk’s decisions, we can expect it to follow his disruptive pattern” – and that’s certainly how things have played out so far.

Musk gave us a clue that things would be different when he walked into Twitter’s HQ in October, the day before the deal was signed, carrying a kitchen sink, apparently to make sure the message ‘sinked-in.’

That was just the beginning, of course, and a host of shockers followed that no-one saw coming.

Pretty much immediately, he got rid of key names in the senior management team including CEO Parag Agrawal and Ned Segal, the chief financial officer. Not long after, he sacked half of Twitter’s 7,500 employees including its communications and human rights teams. He also showed the door to a reported 4,000 contractors.

In November, Musk gave what remained of the workforce an ultimatum either to commit to working “long hours at high intensity” and being “extremely hardcore” or else leave with three months’ severance pay.

Whether this was another deliberate culling exercise or not, it resulted in an additional 1,200 employees walking away from the social media platform, leaving around only 2,000 still on the payroll.