º£½ÇÊÓÆµ

Oops.

Our website is temporarily unavailable in your location.

We are working hard to get it back online.

PRIVACY
Opinionopinion

Edgbaston used to lead way on election night, but no more

General election counts in Birmingham take longer and longer, but the locals were rushed through in a matter of minutes

Labour's Gisela Stuart and Shabana Mahmood at the ICC in Birmingham

Anyone who covered the 1997 election in Birmingham will recall that Gisela Stuart’s victory in the Tory seat of Edgbaston was an early signal that Tony Blair’s New Labour would enjoy a landslide victory. Like Basildon had been in 1992, it was a key result early in the night.

Her successful defence in 2001 election also came early on the night and showed that Labour was set for a second term. From memory these results were in by midnight, or half-past midnight at the latest.

But in 2015 we had to wait until after 4am before a single Birmingham result was announced and it was getting on for 6.30am when Khalid Mahmood was announced as winner in Perry Barr.

Even Lib Dem John Hemming called his defeat more than three hours before the result was announced.

The only upside to this is that it gave pjournalists, candidates, activists and observers time to deal with the extremely temperamental wi-fi available in the state-of-the-art International Conference Centre.

There’s one less seat now, but the turnout is similar. And Sunderland still manages to call a result by about 11pm. So why does it now take so long to count votes in Birmingham?

Council chief executive races through the results

By contrast the local election results seemed to be done and dusted within minutes. Chief executive Mark Rogers read out 40 results at a rate which would have tested horse racing commentary legend Peter O’Sullivan.