º£½ÇÊÓÆµ

Oops.

Our website is temporarily unavailable in your location.

We are working hard to get it back online.

PRIVACY
Opinionopinion

HS2 needs more power across the regions to work

The case for HSR now seems to have shifted onto its possible role in boosting regional regeneration in the West Midlands.

Still image from the HS2 promotional video

So far I’ve been fairly agnostic about High Speed Rail (HSR), probably because I think both the benefits and downsides have been overstated.

But the case for HSR now seems to have shifted onto its possible role in boosting regional regeneration in the West Midlands.

On this, as the leading planner Sir Peter Hall noted recently, the debate boils down to two key issues.

The first is whether, by bringing the Midlands and North closer to the global economic powerhouse of London, it can transform economic prospects in the regions.

Second is how those benefits will be distributed across regions: that is, whether the benefits will be concentrated in a few core cities (think Birmingham), or will be spread across the wider region (such as to Coventry, Stafford, Stoke or Worcester)?

Or as Sir Peter put it, whether HS2 will ‘irrigate’ the wider region, or turn parts of it into a desert?

Comparative research on the º£½ÇÊÓÆµ and France, undertaken by Hall’s colleague Chia-Lin Chen, is striking: there is a danger of creating deserts, but well-designed regional policies can indeed irrigate the regions.

Chen compared investment in (slowish) high speed rail in the º£½ÇÊÓÆµ since the 1970s with that in super-fast TGVs in France from the 1990s. She found that over time both capitals, London and Paris, kept an economic lead over other regions, but in France the gap gradually reduced whereas in the º£½ÇÊÓÆµ it widened.