º£½ÇÊÓÆµ

Oops.

Our website is temporarily unavailable in your location.

We are working hard to get it back online.

PRIVACY
Opinionopinion

Clancy talks of Tory misdirection but is unable to sprinkle any magic on the budget he inherited

The Labour leader has dealt with the legacy of his predecessor and must now start pushing his own agenda

John Clancy on the power of misdirection

Taking over as leader of part way through the municipal year, it was always inevitable John Clancy would end up dealing with the hangover from his predecessor.

The Labour leader was constantly reminded by rivals throughout he was presenting a business plan drawn up by Sir Albert Bore.

For some, this explained why he delivered the speech with grim determination. Supporters said that of course there was always going to be little enthusiasm for another brutal package of enforced cuts.

His first budget was peppered with the usual details - £88 million cut this year and a running total for the austerity era, about £815 million over nine years.

There are to be , although remaining staff would be set free to innovate and adapt - not something one usually associates with local government.

He highlighted the argument over fairer funding, which Birmingham has belatedly won, but too late to avoid cuts. All that was missing here was Sir Albert’s usual assertion that this is the "end of local government as we know it".

Of course, Clancy did, in the spirit of the Kerslake review, also talk about "hope" and set out a long-term vision including the devolution deal, HS2, inward investment. There was a pledge to crack down on intolerance and extremism in all forms and celebrate the city’s diversity.

Few could argue with his priorities of child protection and housing. But the message about protecting the vulnerable from the worst of the cuts, adapting the organisation and embracing regeneration and economic growth as a means to recovery are all familiar themes from Sir Albert’s previous budget days.