º£½ÇÊÓÆµ

Oops.

Our website is temporarily unavailable in your location.

We are working hard to get it back online.

PRIVACY
Opinionopinion

Why the Unite ‘bogeyman’ may be just a mirage

And its function in our political life? An instrument of self-aggrandisement for Len McCluskey and a convenient bogeyman for the Tories.

Ed Miliband

If by some mischance you’ve happened upon Prime Minister’s Questions recently, you’ll be familiar with David Cameron’s obsession with Unite – the country’s largest trade union and Labour’s biggest union donor – and its General Secretary, Len McCluskey.

For several months the PM has seemed unable to answer two consecutive questions from Ed Miliband without reminding him how he owes his election to the votes of unions like Unite, which has now, he accuses, “taken over” the party: funding it, dictating policy, and controlling the selection of parliamentary candidates.

It’s a typical Westminster game with a small kernel of truth at its centre, which, when distorted and repeated shoutily thrice weekly, most of us find puerile. But Cameron’s unstoppable, and he was at it again last Wednesday, accusing Unite of choosing Labour’s candidates.

This particular distortion involves asserting that the dubious and possibly fraudulent practices of the Unite-dominated Falkirk Labour Party, during the subsequently suspended selection of the constituency’s parliamentary by-election candidate, are being replicated nationwide in the many other seats where Unite-backed candidates are seeking adoption.

Michael Crick in his Channel 4 News blog challenged this supposed Unite hijack of candidate selection by examining its effectiveness. Of 41 constituencies targeted by Unite as seats where it hoped to get named individuals selected as Labour candidates, the union has been successful so far in 18 and unsuccessful in 20 – a 47 per cent success rate, which Crick suggested “doesn’t seem a very good return”.

Certainly, it falls short of the despotic control that Cameron would have us envisage. But neither is it rubbish, and, with Unite’s West Midlands success rate being over 70 per cent, it seemed worth looking behind the numbers.

First, as ever with Labour candidate selections, we must master the lists – at least three of them here. Number One is the party’s own Target Seat list: 108 constituencies, none currently held by Labour, which it hopes to gain in 2015 and on which it will focus most of its electoral effort. Fourteen are in the West Midlands.

Number Two is the All-women Shortlist list: the 50 per cent of target seats where Labour has decreed its candidate will be chosen not in an Open Selection, but from an All-women Shortlist (AWS). A disproportionate nine of these are in the West Midlands.