º£½ÇÊÓÆµ

Oops.

Our website is temporarily unavailable in your location.

We are working hard to get it back online.

PRIVACY
Manufacturing

Work on Swansea Bay lagoon project not authorised council reaffirms

ABP has now instructed Tidal Power to cease work on its land

How the Swansea Bay tidal lagoon could have looked

Swansea Council has again written to Tidal Power Plc reaffirming that work it has started on a tidal lagoon project is unauthorised.

Despite both Swansea and the º£½ÇÊÓÆµ Government informing Tidal Power Plc that the planning consent for the project, through a development consent order, lapsed at the end of last month, the company is still insisting it has complied with its conditions to allow work to start onshore.

The º£½ÇÊÓÆµ Government, through its Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, said to comply with the DCO, granted back in June, 2015, it required a number of conditions to have been satisfied to allow work to commence within the five year window, which expired on June 30th.

This included agreeing a de-commissioning programme for the mooted £1.2bn tidal lagoon, for which the Westminster Government in 2018 said it couldn't provide a green subsidy for saying it was too expensive for a project that would also only create a relatively small number of jobs.

For any work on a lagoon to start offshore it would also have needed a sea bed licence from Crown Estates and a marine licence from Natural Resources Wales.

Despite confirmation from the council and the º£½ÇÊÓÆµ Government that the project's DCO has lapsed on June 30th, Tidal Power Plc is maintaining it has compiled having started work on June 29th.

However, in a statement Swansea Council has reaffirmed its position of June 30th, that the project's DCO has lapsed and work being undertaken is unauthorised.

A Swansea Council spokesperson said: "The council has taken further independent legal advice and we wrote to Tidal  Power again last night to confirm that the development consent order had expired because Tidal Power had failed to meet its requirements within the five-year timescale set out in the DCO.