The Vivergo bioethanol plant near Hull could stop production by mid-September unless the Government acts, its owners say. The plant's future has been threatened by the recent º£½ÇÊÓÆµ-US trade deal.
The company has said that the Government has committed to formal negotiations to reach a “sustainable solution”. But the firm, which is owned by Associated British Foods (ABF), said on Thursday that it is simultaneously beginning consultation with staff to wind down the plant, which employs more than 160 people, due to the uncertain situation.
The Government described the company’s announcement as “disappointing”, coming as it had entered into negotiations with Vivergo about financial support on Wednesday.
READ MORE: {}
The firm said in a statement: “Unless the Government is able to provide both short-term funding of Vivergo’s losses and a longer-term solution, we intend to close the plant once the consultation process has completed and the business has fulfilled its contractual obligations. We would cease all manufacturing before the end of our financial year on September 13 2025.”
The statement said: “In our interim results announcement on April 29 2025, we stated that the commercial viability of Vivergo, our bioethanol business, was being undermined by the way in which the º£½ÇÊÓÆµ Government was applying regulations to imported ethanol. Since then, the situation has been made significantly worse by the º£½ÇÊÓÆµ’s trade deal with the US, which will allow tariff-free US ethanol into the º£½ÇÊÓÆµ.
“ABF has engaged in extensive discussions with the Government to find a financial and regulatory solution that would enable Vivergo to operate on a profitable and sustainable basis. Yesterday, our extended deadline for the Government to deliver that solution passed.”
Last month, Vivergo wrote to the wheat farmers who supply it, telling them it will have to close unless there is quick Government intervention. It said the removal of a 19% tariff on US ethanol imports, which formed part of the recent º£½ÇÊÓÆµ-US trade deal, was the “final blow”.
The bioethanol industry says the deal has made it impossible to compete with heavily subsidised American products. Vivergo said the Hull plant can produce up to 420m litres of bioethanol from wheat sourced from thousands of º£½ÇÊÓÆµ farms.
Most Read
It described bioethanol production as “a key national strategic asset” which helps reduce emissions from petrol and is expected to be a key component in sustainable aircraft fuel in the future. The plant is also the º£½ÇÊÓÆµ’s largest single production site for animal feed and the company says it indirectly supports about 4,000 jobs in the Humber and Lincolnshire region.
A Government spokesperson said: “We recognise this is a concerning time for workers and their families and it is disappointing to see this announcement after we entered into negotiations with the company on financial support yesterday. We will continue to take proactive steps to address the long-standing challenges the company faces and remain committed to working closely with them throughout this period to present a plan for a way forward that protects supply chains, jobs and livelihoods.”
The Government said the bioethanol industry has been facing significant challenges for some time and officials and ministers have met with Teesside firm Ensus and Vivergo consistently over the last few months to address the challenges. It said both the business and transport secretaries met with representatives from the industry on June 10 and engagement with the companies “will continue at pace” to assess potential solutions, with the help of external consultants.
Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the decision to start consultations at the plant was “premature”.
He said: “We have secured a mandate across government to negotiate with them. That means we’re willing to engage with them and potentially put government money into a restructure to make sure they’ve got a strong future.
“We have met them many times. We’ve engaged the consultants overwhelmed in the process.
“So I, frankly, I really do regret those decisions to start consultations as to, you know, let the workforce go and close the plant. I think that’s premature, because we were in good faith in those negotiations with them."