º£½ÇÊÓÆµ

Oops.

Our website is temporarily unavailable in your location.

We are working hard to get it back online.

PRIVACY
Enterprise

Renewable energy trust dividends at risk as Stifel warns of subsidy cliff

The subsidies currently underpinning many of the º£½ÇÊÓÆµ's renewable energy projects are due to expire in the next decade, leaving the dividends of infrastructure trusts at risk

Wind turbines(Image: Getty Images)

Stifel has issued a warning that the dividends of renewable infrastructure investment trusts could become more volatile as subsidies for clean energy are set to expire in the coming years.

Many renewable infrastructure projects will see their government-backed Contracts for Difference, which provide developers with a stable revenue stream, expire between 2032 and 2035, as reported by .

These subsidies are crucial for providing a strong 'fixed' revenue stream, allowing the trusts to back their dividends, typically accounting for around 60 per cent of a fund's income.

Stifel analysts Iain Scouller and William Crighton stated: "We think the switch from the certainty of subsidy revenues to a higher degree of market revenues will increase the risk profile of the sector, reflecting volatile power prices," said Stifel analysts Iain Scouller and William Crighton.

While renewables trusts often make reference to the 'average asset life' of the portfolio, meaning the expected time until their infrastructure is no longer operational, less attention is paid to when subsidies are due to expire.

Some do provide the information, however, as The Renewable Infrastructure Group states that " While renewables trusts often refer to the 'average asset life' of the portfolio, less attention is given to when subsidies are due to expire."

However, some do provide this information, such as The Renewable Infrastructure Group stating that "the weighted average subsidy life remaining is nine years," while Octopus Renewables has provided a detailed breakdown.

Octopus Renewables revenue forecast

Scouller and Crighton added: "We suspect the boards would be prepared to pay dividends effectively out of capital, if necessary, given the importance of dividends for the sector."