º£½ÇÊÓÆµ

Oops.

Our website is temporarily unavailable in your location.

We are working hard to get it back online.

PRIVACY
Economic Development

Wales needs long overdue leasehold system reform says former First Minister

Vaughan Gething made the call in a Senedd debate

Vaughan Gething.(Image: Christopher Furlong/Getty Images))

Former First Minister Vaughan Gething has called for “long-overdue” reform to the leasehold system, warning of injustice, iniquity and unscrupulous landlords fleecing households. The now backbench MS said leasehold properties are still being created in Wales following a significant increase over the past two decades.

Leading a short debate he told the Senedd: “Long leases – typically those exceeding 21 years – frequently require a leaseholder to pay an annual ground rent, for which the landlord does not have to provide a clear service in return or, indeed, any service.

“It is, effectively, a means for an unscrupulous landlord to lever money out of leaseholders with precious little effective right to challenge or oppose the demands.”

Mr Gething acknowledged a Tory-introduced ban on ground rent in new leaseholds in Wales and England from 2022, but he warned existing leaseholders remain subject to rising rents.

The Cardiff South and Penarth Senedd member raised concerns about the process for leaseholders to buy their freehold, citing the example of Hayes Point in his constituency. “The unfairness of arms is again apparent,” he said. “Determined leaseholders need to be able to give time, money and commitment, while the cards are still loaded in favour of the freeholder.”

Mr Gething, who has announced he intends to stand down at the next election in 2026, warned it is far too hard for leaseholders to take up the right to manage their estates.

The former trade union lawyer cited examples of developers frustrating the process by not completing the estate, so the right to self-management does not crystallise.

He said: “A number of leaseholders, therefore, are trapped, and there is still a lack of transparency about the fees charged … access to that information and how, practically people can exercise the rights that, in theory, they already have.”