º£½ÇÊÓÆµ

Oops.

Our website is temporarily unavailable in your location.

We are working hard to get it back online.

PRIVACY
Economic Development

Teesworks report finds no illegality or corruption but criticises scheme for value for money

Labour and Conservative politicians continue to clash over the º£½ÇÊÓÆµ's largest regeneration site

The Teesworks industrial site, near Redcar, which was previously home to the SSI steel plant(Image: Copyright Unknown)

An independent inquiry into the North East’s largest regeneration scheme has found no corruption or illegality but has criticised governance and transparency at the project.

The Teesworks scheme, which has been led by Tees Valley’s Conservative mayor Ben Houchen, has been subject to an inquiry led by three senior local authority officers, which was ordered by Levelling Up Secretary Michael Gove last year. The report has found no evidence of any allegations of illegality or corruption and has supported the mayor’s denials that land was sold to developers for as little as £1 an acre. It also backs his claims that the scheme has already brought in economic benefits.

But the inquiry panel has found that the handling of the project by the Tees Valley Combined Authority and the South Tees Development had not always been robust enough to provide evidence of value for money and made a series of 28 recommendations for Mr Houchen and the Government to improve handling of the scheme.

Read more: £200m boost for Sunderland battery plant

Go here for more North East business news

The panel said they were “surprised” that a report ahead of the 50-50 venture’s establishment in 2020 contained “so little detailed explanation and implies that there aren’t any material implications directly arising from this change in approach”, even though the result of the venture was “that two or three privately owned companies would likely receive significant financial returns”. It added that a high level of confidentiality around the subsequent transfer of the ownership to a 90-10 division of shares in favour of the private sector partners in late 2021 “may be seen as an omission which has exacerbated the extent of public scepticism about the value for money of the project”.

The panel said: “We have found no evidence to support allegations of corruption or illegality. However, there are issues of governance and transparency that need to be addressed and a number of decisions taken by the bodies and management evidence received involved do not meet the standards expected when managing public funds. The panel have therefore concluded that the systems of governance and finance in place within TVCA and STDC at present do not include the expected sufficiency of transparency and oversight across the system to evidence value for money.

“It is important that local leaders work together to secure the much needed regeneration of the site. Securing permanent local jobs, economic growth and opportunity, as well as increased tax income for the local area that can be reinvested in local services and continued growth is a priority and shared endeavour. To this end we have made a number of recommendations for the Secretary of State, TVCA and STDC to consider.”