º£½ÇÊÓÆµ

Oops.

Our website is temporarily unavailable in your location.

We are working hard to get it back online.

PRIVACY
Economic Development

Plans to build 4,115 homes near M5 spark backlash as seven villages fight scheme

The proposal also includes almost 60 acres for employment land including a 25-acre business park, a hotel and shops, cafes, restaurants, pubs and takeaways

Bloor Homes And Persimmon Homes want permission to build the new Elms Park development near junction 10 of the M5(Image: Bloor Homes and Persimmon Homes/Cheltenham Borough Council)

Plans for a huge residential project of 4,115 new homes near Cheltenham are facing significant opposition, with over 110 people and seven villages expressing their fears about the potential "disastrous effect" on the local area.

The ambitious Elms Park development, led by Bloor Homes and Persimmon Homes and located close to junction 10 of the M5, is scheduled to be reviewed by Tewkesbury and Cheltenham Borough planners next week.

Encompassing nearly 60 acres allocated for employment opportunities, the project includes a 25-acre business park, hospitality venues, shopping outlets, eateries, licensed establishments and takeaways.

The plans also feature a public transport hub, educational institutions from primary through to secondary level, sports amenities, green spaces, pedestrian avenues, bike paths, and improved road access via Tewkesbury Road and Manor Road.

The huge scheme stretching across swathes of land from Swindon Village to Uckington and between Tewkesbury Road to Brockhampton has been met strong resistance.

Concerns raised by objectors – including seven parish councils – hinge on issues such as the design and visual impact of the housing, road safety, traffic and parking problems, environmental pollution, flooding risk, loss of privacy, and conflicts with existing planning policies.

The parish councils representing Uckington, Swindon, Elmstone Hardwicke, Stoke Orchard and Treddington, Bishop's Cleeve, Leigh, Leckhampton and Warden Hill have all lodged objections against the proposed development.

A total of 111 individuals have voiced their opposition to the project, expressing concerns over its potentially "disastrous effect", while four letters of support have been received.