º£½ÇÊÓÆµ

Oops.

Our website is temporarily unavailable in your location.

We are working hard to get it back online.

PRIVACY
Economic Developmentopinion

Clubs can’t expect fans to just keep on paying more to watch football

Accountancy group BDO claimed that up to one third of football clubs in the Championship and League One will be put up for sale over the next 12-18 months.

Football fans

A widely-publicised report published this week by accountancy group BDO claimed that up to one third of football clubs in the Championship and League One will be put up for sale over the next 12-18 months.

The report painted a particularly bleak picture of life in English football’s second tier: a staggering 94% of finance directors at Championship clubs acknowledged that, when examined as commercial entities, they’re massively over-reliant on their principal shareholders to finance operating losses.

If true, it’s a situation that cannot continue indefinitely; even the most devoted owners have to call time on pumping funds into struggling businesses simply to keep them afloat. This raises another question: where are the buyers going to come from? In most instances, football supporter trusts are the only organisations both capable and willing to acquire what, in many cases, are rapidly depreciating assets.

A couple of days after the BDO research was published, UEFA General Secretary Gianni Infantino, interviewed by the BBC, said that although football clubs understandably seek to improve profitability (in most cases, reducing losses would represent significant progress), they must not alienate fans by over-charging them.

“Fans are the only ones who remain loyal throughout their life to the club,” said Mr Infantino. “Everybody else sooner or later changes – players, managers, even owners – so a dialogue with fans to find the right balance is a good thing.”

Mr Infantino makes a valid point, but the problem is, it’s been made on umpteen occasions before and next to nothing has happened as a consequence. This, as clubs know, has everything to do with the elasticity of (in this case, football supporter) demand, a potent feature of everyday life.

For example, when the Chancellor next raises taxes on motorists, or smokers, or drinkers, he knows that while everyone agrees that lowering carbon emissions, reducing the number of smokers, or getting people to drink fewer pints of beer is deemed “a good thing”, he’d be in quite a financial pickle if citizens decided to drive, smoke or drink less.

This is because the elasticity of motorist, smoker and drinker demand is significant, ie people will pay whatever it takes to drive, smoke or enjoy a drink and the Chancellor knows that demand will remain constantly high, almost irrespective of the imposition of his taxes.