º£½ÇÊÓÆµ

Oops.

Our website is temporarily unavailable in your location.

We are working hard to get it back online.

PRIVACY
Economic Development

Mayor of London's Oxford Street plan must include 'vital' new feature, º£½ÇÊÓÆµ business leaders say

Sadiq Khan has been told that his plan to pedestrianise Oxford Street must include a key new feature, which is vital to the success of his plan, according to business leaders

CGI of a pedestrianised Oxford Street in London(Image: Transport for London (TfL))

The Mayor of London's vision to transform Oxford Street into a pedestrian-friendly space has found an ally in the hospitality sector, with calls for the inclusion of diverse dining and recreation options.

Kate Nicholls, º£½ÇÊÓÆµ Hospitality's chief executive, contributed her thoughts on the proposal in a correspondence to Sir Sadiq Khan, emphasizing hospitality's integral role in the success of the revamped shopping artery, as reported by .

In her communication, which City AM had the opportunity to review, Nicholl's voiced her tentative endorsement: "In principle we support the proposal," she wrote.

Her insistence on the importance of hospitality is clear: "It is our belief that for this to be successful it is imperative that hospitality is used to animate the new pedestrianised area."

She further underscored the value of blending hospitality with other sectors: "When we talk of healthy, successful high streets, one important measure is the diversity created by a mix of hospitality, leisure and retail. All of these are important, and all work together."

The lobbying group's input comes on the heels of a two-month public feedback session on the transformation effort, which seeks to block vehicular access – including cars, buses, and bicycles – to the renowned route, with proposed changes focusing on the section stretching from Oxford Circus to Selfridges. The pedestrianisation project faces a financial impact estimated at £150m borne by the taxpayers.

The public consultation period, which concluded on 2 May, saw a wave of interventions both in favour and against the proposal.

Critics, including opposition politicians in the London Assembly, have voiced concerns over the Greater London Authority's (GLA) lack of detailed information and commitment to transparency regarding the project.