º£½ÇÊÓÆµ

Oops.

Our website is temporarily unavailable in your location.

We are working hard to get it back online.

PRIVACY
Economic Development

HS2 viaduct decision deferred as residents slam 'monstrous procession of concrete V-signs'

HS2 developers say they are consulting with the local community

CGI of HS2's proposed Balsall Common Viaduct (Image: HS2)

A decision on granting permission for a giant HS2 viaduct in rural Solihull has been deferred after the project's design was slammed by local residents who accused HS2 of not conducting a proper consultation.

Planning permission for the Balsall Common viaduct was been deferred by Solihull Council at a heated meeting on Wednesday that saw accusations of HS2 treating local people as ‘second-class citizens’ and not conducting proper consultation.

In the council chamber, HS2 was accused of ‘mushroom management’ when dealing with locals – defined by a Balsall Parish Councillor as ‘keep them in the dark and feed them manure’.

Meanwhile, representatives of HS2 Ltd doubled down on their consultation process, insisting the designs had gone through many stages of development off the back of community feedback. Planners had recommended the scheme for approval prior to the meeting.

The 425 metre-long structure would bridge a gap over floodplain land to the northeast of Berkswell railway station. Once finished, it would connect high-speed strains travelling from the south through the Interchange station and onto Curzon Street in central Birmingham.

The deferral means planning officers will go back to HS2 and look to present a different solution to members of the committee. The powerful High Speed Rail Act 2017 decrees that the viaduct will happen at some point, but approval for certain design and construction matters must still be given by the local authority.

Local resident Richard Lloyd started the debate, saying: “Hideous means something that should be hidden, but we know that can’t be done. We are told we must have a brutalist design with exposed beams, lumps of projecting concrete and piers every 25 metres.

“We shouldn’t be in this position. Parliament told HS2 that the opinion of residents mattered, not some design panel that never came near what they eulogised about.