º£½ÇÊÓÆµ

Oops.

Our website is temporarily unavailable in your location.

We are working hard to get it back online.

PRIVACY
Economic Development

Government knocks back Liverpool Council's bid to force controversial Fox Street Village scheme to improve or be demolished

The council wanted to force the developer to demolish most of the failed scheme - or make dozens of urgent improvements

The Fox Street Village scheme, with Block B visible to the right of the converted warehouse(Image: Liverpool Echo)

Attempts to place enforcement measures on the controversial Fox Street Village scheme in Liverpool have been quashed by the government's planning inspectorate.

Liverpool City Council tried in March to force the collapsed scheme in Everton to either be mostly demolished or for dozens of urgent changes to be made, over fears the development fails to meet standards and has been "poorly finished".

Those improvements included dozens of measures such as detailing how health risks and other concerns can be remedied, as well as building basement car parking. The enforcement notice laid out how some of the measures were required to be carried out within a week of it becoming active.

But Dr Michael Steiner of Fox Street Village Investors Association appealed against the notice, citing national planning legislation on the grounds that the period given to remedy the failings fell short of "what should reasonably be allowed".

Quashing the enforcement notice, planning inspector AA Phillips said the council did not specify with "sufficient clarity" the alleged breach of planning control relating to the development's Block A.

The sign at the front of the Fox Street Village development in Liverpool(Image: LIVERPOOL ECHO)

The document said the council's error was that the allegation should have been one of development without planning permission - and a breach of condition, instead of a breach of planning control.

He also said there were a number of errors in the notice and that it did not in places specify the conditions that had been breached - although that those could "be corrected without causing injustice to parties".

A spokesman for the council put the ruling down to a "technicality" - and said the authority still hopes to take action against the failed development.