º£½ÇÊÓÆµ

Oops.

Our website is temporarily unavailable in your location.

We are working hard to get it back online.

PRIVACY
Economic Development

Bid to make North East into region where companies pay 'real' living wage

Difference between the Government's National Living Wage and the rate called for by campaigners is still an issue, eight years on

Chancellor Rachel Reeves poses with the red box outside number 11 Downing Street on October 30(Image: Getty Images)

When Chancellor George Osborne established the National Living Wage in 2015, it set in motion two competing narratives.

The re-branding of the previous Labour Government’s minimum wage led to big rises in wages for millions of the º£½ÇÊÓÆµ’s lowest paid workers, not something that had previously seemed to be at the top of Mr Osborne’s political agenda.

But it also led to a conflict with the Living Wage movement that is ongoing to this day, thanks to the two measures having effectively the same name.

Mr Osborne’s first National Living Wage came into effect in 2016 at £7.20 an hour, since then the official figure for the lowest companies can legally pay has been lower - though getting increasingly closer - to what campaigners took to calling the “real living wage”, a figure calculated to match what is needed for a job to support a basic standard of living, covering basics such as food, rent, and childcare.

Eight years (and, alarmingly, seven Chancellors) later, Rachel Reeves has been the latest to hail a rise in the National Living Wage, saying its 6.7% increase to £12.21 an hour next year marks a “significant step” towards delivering on Labour’s manifesto promise to introduce a “genuine living wage for working people”.

The increase, recommended by the Low Pay Commission, will mean an extra £1,400 a year for a full-time worker earning the main minimum wage rate from next April, though that increased cost - coupled with higher rates of employers’ national insurance contributions - has sparked concerns from organisations representing some small businesses.

When the proposed increase was announced Baroness Philippa Stroud, chair of the Low Pay Commission, said: “The Government have been clear about their ambitions for the National Minimum Wage and its importance in supporting workers’ living standards. At the same time, employers have had to deal with the adult rate rising over 20% in two years, and the challenges that has created alongside other pressures to their cost base.

“It is our job to balance these considerations, ensuring the NLW provides a fair wage for the lowest-paid workers while taking account of economic factors. These rates secure a real-terms pay increase for the lowest-paid workers. Young workers will see substantial increases in their pay floor, making up some of the ground lost against the adult rate over time.”