Plans that could see a new storage and distribution business to be built on the site of a former printing hall in Speke in Liverpool have been recommended to move forward despite more than 100 objections. Earlier this summer, "high speed explosives" were used to knock down the former Prinovis factory.
In a bid to make way for a new 88,000m logistics warehouse, the previous facilities were razed to the ground in a controlled explosion heard across the south of Liverpool. It was confirmed in October last year GB Europe Holdings Limited to Liverpool Council for land on Dakota Drive.
Now the proposals are to go before the city council's planning committee with a view to being approved. This is despite more than 100 objections being submitted to the plans.
READ MORE: {}
When Prinovis closed its factory in June 2023, more than 200 jobs were lost as a result. Its closure was first confirmed in 2022, citing a downturn in the market. Letters were sent to households around Speke and Garston ahead of planned activity on June 8.
Road closures were put in place to protect people from "high speed explosives." If planning approval is granted by the local authority next week, the logistics facility will be operated by Uniserve, part of the GB Europe Holdings group of companies.
Once fully operational, it is hoped that more than 500 new jobs would be created within the area, generating around £35m for the local economy. This is in addition to up to approximately 680 jobs supported during construction.
The existing outdated buildings would be replaced with a purpose built facility providing office space, HGV loading and staff parking. The site has not been subject to any previous applications in the last five years and is surrounded by the B&M storage and distribution facility.
The city council approved demolition of the existing buildings in December last year. However, the new plans were met with stern objections in the community.
Most Read
Planning documents said: "In response to the first round of consultation, 102 neighbour objections were received." The council papers added: "In response to the first round of consultation, Councillor Sam Gorst objected to the application on that grounds that Banks Road is hazardous due to potholes.
"The entrance would increase the likelihood of a road traffic accident. There would be limited visibility, increases more risks to cyclists with it situated on a cycle lane area.
"There would be more congestion. Councillor Lucy Williams raised concerns in relation to the first round of consultation that given the size of the development not enough residents, businesses and school have been informed or consulted with.
"Only a very small number of houses have been sent the consultation letter and therefore many people may not be aware of this application."