º£½ÇÊÓÆµ

Oops.

Our website is temporarily unavailable in your location.

We are working hard to get it back online.

PRIVACY
Commercial Property

Grand Designs-style glass home on top of historic water tower gets green light

The 17-metre high Victorian water tower in Lancashire, which is Grade II* listed, has been empty for years

The water tower plan for Tower Hill, Ormskirk, by Snook Architects(Image: Plan submitted by Snook Architects, Liverpool, to West Lancashire Council)

A glass structure atop a historic water tower has been given the go-ahead to be transformed into a dream family home. Despite concerns from neighbours about potential impacts on garden sunlight, privacy, and fears it could become a tourist attraction, councillors have approved plans for the Grade II* listed Victorian structure at Tower Hill in Ormskirk.

The 17-metre high tower, featuring nine stone-built legs topped with Romanesque arches, is currently listed on Historic England's Buildings at Risk register. A planning application submitted by Neil Dawson of Snook Architects in Aintree, Liverpool, was approved at the latest meeting of West Lancashire Council's development control committee.

The applicant is also the owner of the building. Although permission for conversion was granted in 2017, a time limit had passed necessitating a new application. The conversion will see living accommodation built above the tower and in the void where an iron water tank sat before it was removed in the 1980s.

However, the conversion plan has sparked debate among residents living near the water tower.

Several objections were lodged with West Lancashire Council regarding the proposed changes. Brian Farrimond, a resident of Tower Hill, expressed his concerns in writing: "We feel that the proposal still does not accord the respect the tower deserves. The structure on top of the tower is wholly out of keeping with the rest of the building.", reports .

He added: "Regarding overlooking, we fail to see how the louvres would make any significant contribution to protecting the privacy of neighbours. They appear to be easily by-passed by viewers on the balcony. The addition of a platform at the top only makes the invasion of privacy worse."

Mr Farrimond further noted that the proposed entrance seemed 'much wider' and the garage larger than previous plans.

In addition, Helen Pugh, another Tower Hill resident, penned her support for the conversion but raised concerns about the design: "We support the conversion of the water tower to maintain this important, historic building. However we feel the proposed design is visually unsympathetic to this Victorian construction.